- UPDATED:
Vivid Seats Historic Lawsuits
Vivid Seats, a leading online ticket marketplace, has faced multiple legal challenges over the years, ranging from allegations of unfair business practices to deceptive advertising tactics. These lawsuits have raised concerns about the company’s pricing methods, refund policies, and intellectual property practices.
Key Past Lawsuits and Settlements
Vivid Seats has faced several high-profile class-action lawsuits, with some of the most significant involving refund policies and ticket availability issues.
2021 COVID-19 Refund Class Action Settlement
In 2021, Vivid Seats settled a class-action lawsuit for $7.5 million after being accused of unfairly changing its refund policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. The lawsuit was filed in Illinois federal court and claimed that Vivid Seats failed to provide customers with the promised refunds for canceled events, instead offering credit for future purchases. The settlement addressed these allegations, compensating affected consumers who were impacted by the policy changes during the pandemic.
2019 "Bait-and-Switch" Lawsuit
In 2019, Vivid Seats was named in a class-action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The lawsuit accused the company of using deceptive “bait-and-switch” tactics to lure customers into purchasing tickets. According to the plaintiffs, Vivid Seats advertised falsely discounted tickets to attract buyers, but when customers attempted to purchase the tickets, they found that the prices had been inflated or the tickets were no longer available. This lawsuit highlighted concerns over transparency and fairness in the ticket-selling industry.
2018 Inflated Pricing Lawsuit
In 2018, another class-action lawsuit was filed against Vivid Seats in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. This lawsuit alleged that Vivid Seats was selling tickets at inflated prices and, in some cases, offering tickets that were not actually available for purchase. The plaintiffs claimed that Vivid Seats engaged in misleading practices by advertising tickets at inflated prices and failing to deliver tickets to customers who made purchases. The case raised concerns about the company’s pricing and ticket availability practices.
Copyright Infringement
Vivid Seats is also involved in a separate legal dispute over copyright infringement. In 2025, photographer Larry Philpot filed a lawsuit against the company, accusing it of using his photographs on its website without proper attribution or permission. The lawsuit alleges that Vivid Seats displayed, copied, and published Philpot’s photographs without compensating him or obtaining the necessary rights to use his work. This case highlights ongoing concerns in the digital age about the unauthorized use of creative content and the rights of photographers and other creators.
Vivid Seats Faces Ongoing Legal Scrutiny
Vivid Seats has been embroiled in numerous legal battles over the years, from issues related to misleading pricing and deceptive advertising to consumer protection violations and intellectual property disputes. The company’s recent legal challenges, including claims of hidden fees, false advertising, and copyright infringement, underscore the ongoing scrutiny it faces in the competitive online ticket marketplace.
For consumers affected by Vivid Seats’ practices, it’s important to understand your rights and take action if you believe you have been misled or treated unfairly. The class-action lawsuits and settlements highlight the growing concerns about transparency and fairness in the ticket-selling industry.
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.