Mass Arbitrations Against Food Delivery Apps
- July 17, 2026
- Why Food Delivery Apps Are Facing Mass Arbitrations
- Typical Claims in Mass Arbitrations Against Delivery Apps
- The FTC’s Rule on Deceptive Fees
- Notable Mass Arbitrations Against Food Delivery Apps
- How Mass Arbitration Levels the Playing Field
- Are You Eligible? A Checklist for Delivery App Users
- How Class Action U Can Help
Why Food Delivery Apps Are Facing Mass Arbitrations
Food delivery platforms have become a common industry target for mass arbitration due to a high frequency of similar disputes and the arbitration clauses embedded in their terms of service. These clauses often require users, drivers, couriers, or other platform participants to resolve disputes through arbitration rather than court.
Additionally, the prevalence of unfair trade practices such as deceptive marketing, hidden “junk” fees, and more has led many individuals to consider mass legal action against food delivery companies.
Typical Claims in Mass Arbitrations Against Delivery Apps
Some recurring legal claims that can lead to mass arbitrations against food delivery apps include pricing transparency, delivery charges, unauthorized fees, data practices, and performance issues. These companies may be violating state laws and consumers’ rights by improperly disclosing, representing, and charging fees for using their services.
Data Privacy and Unauthorized Use
User data issues, such as unauthorized tracking or data sharing by food delivery apps, may lead to mass arbitration claims when users’ privacy is violated and their personal information is compromised.
Service Quality and Misrepresentation
Mass arbitration against food delivery companies can also focus on claims related to poor service or misleading app representations via deceptive marketing.
Hidden Fees and Unclear Pricing
On food delivery apps, consumers are sometimes charged illegal fees or subjected to unlawful “drip pricing” practices that delay fee disclosure until the last minute in the online checkout process. Fees, surge pricing, and unclear cost breakdowns can lead to mass consumer disputes that are resolved through arbitration.
The FTC’s Rule on Deceptive Fees
In May 2025, the Federal Trade Commission’s Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees took effect, requiring certain businesses to disclose mandatory fees up front to limit bait-and-switch marketing. Although this rule currently applies only to live ticketing and short-term lodging companies, the FTC has warned other industries—including rideshare—of its authority to bring actions for deceptive pricing practices like bait-and-switch pricing and misrepresentation.
Notable Mass Arbitrations Against Food Delivery Apps
DoorDash
DoorDash has faced scrutiny over allegations that its website and app may use third-party data-collection tools without adequately informing users. These tools may collect information about users’ interactions with the platform, such as browsing activity, account activity, device information, and other usage data. In some cases, this information may be shared with third parties in ways consumers may not fully understand or expect.
Uber Eats
In April 2022, a New York appeals court refused Uber’s request to block the American Arbitration Association from charging it $92 million in fees for 31,000 arbitration demands by Uber Eats customers. The customers allege that Uber’s temporary 2020 policy of waiving delivery fees for Black-owned restaurants was racially discriminatory.
Grubhub
Grubhub has faced allegations and enforcement actions for allegedly intercepting and sharing user data, including IP addresses and pixel data, without their consent or transparency. Additionally, Grubhub has faced claims of price-fixing by forcing restaurants to charge high prices on the app, as well as classifying its drivers as independent contractors instead of employees to avoid providing benefits.
In late 2022, the Washington D.C. attorney general sued Grubhub, alleging the company charged hidden fees and used deceptive marketing practices that misled consumers about the true cost of food delivery. The case later resolved through a $3.5 million settlement. As part of the settlement, Grubhub agreed to make additional fees more prominent, list fees as separate line items and stop charging menu prices that were higher than those offered by restaurants.
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.
How Mass Arbitration Levels the Playing Field
When you sign up for a food delivery app and accept its terms of service, you may be unknowingly signing a binding arbitration agreement that prevents you from filing a lawsuit against the company.
However, while you may have “waived” your right to sue in court, you retain the right to arbitrate, and doing it as a group via a mass filing presents costs too high for the company to ignore. In many consumer arbitration programs, companies may bear substantial administrative or filing fees, and large coordinated filings can create significant arbitration costs. However, fee allocation depends on the applicable arbitration agreement, forum rules, and claim type.
Are You Eligible? A Checklist for Delivery App Users
If you used a food delivery app and believe you were harmed by unfair practices like hidden fees or data privacy violations, you may be eligible to join a mass arbitration. Speak with an experienced mass arbitration lawyer to learn more about your eligibility and next steps.
Verification of App Usage
Eligibility usually depends on the specific claim, platform, state law, arbitration agreement, and alleged violation period. Relevant evidence may include account records, order history, receipts, screenshots, app communications, or proof of data-sharing or fee-related harm.
Receipts and ‘Dark Pattern’ Evidence
Saving your digital receipts and screenshots of “hidden” service fees is critical for your arbitration demand, as they can serve as evidence that the company caused you financial harm.
How Class Action U Can Help
Class Action U is your authoritative source for all things related to mass arbitration. Our goal is to simplify the process for individuals to join ongoing mass arbitration cases by connecting them with our legal partners who can evaluate their claims and assist with filing arbitration demands.
If you’ve been affected by an issue that could merit a mass arbitration proceeding against a food delivery app, we encourage you to share your information with us. For eligible participants in a mass arbitration, our site offers a straightforward way to sign up. View our list of current mass arbitrations today to see if you qualify for compensation
New cases and investigations, settlement deadlines, and news straight to your inbox.